Towards Measuring and Understanding Performance in Infrastructure- and Function-as-a-Service Clouds

Context. Cloud computing has become the de facto standard for deploying modern software systems, which makes its performance crucial to the efficient functioning of many applications. However, the unabated growth of established cloud services, such as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), and the emergence of new services, such as Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), has led to an unprecedented diversity of cloud services with different performance characteristics.Objective. The goal of this licentiate thesis is to measure and understand performance in IaaS and FaaS clouds. My PhD thesis will extend and leverage this understanding to propose solutions for building performance-optimized FaaS cloud applications.Method.\ua0To achieve this goal, quantitative and qualitative research methods are used, including experimental research, artifact analysis, and literature review.Findings.\ua0The thesis proposes a cloud benchmarking methodology to estimate application performance in IaaS clouds, characterizes typical FaaS applications, identifies gaps in literature on FaaS performance evaluations, and examines the reproducibility of reported FaaS performance experiments. The evaluation of the benchmarking methodology yielded promising results for benchmark-based application performance estimation under selected conditions. Characterizing 89 FaaS applications revealed that they are most commonly used for short-running tasks with low data volume and bursty workloads. The review of 112 FaaS performance studies from academic and industrial sources found a strong focus on a single cloud platform using artificial micro-benchmarks and discovered that the majority of studies do not follow reproducibility principles on cloud experimentation.Future Work. Future work will propose a suite of application performance benchmarks for FaaS, which is instrumental for evaluating candidate solutions towards building performance-optimized FaaS applications

Performance Evaluation of Serverless Applications and Infrastructures

Context. Cloud computing has become the de facto standard for deploying modern web-based software systems, which makes its performance crucial to the efficient functioning of many applications. However, the unabated growth of established cloud services, such as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), and the emergence of new serverless services, such as Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), has led to an unprecedented diversity of cloud services with different performance characteristics. Measuring these characteristics is difficult in dynamic cloud environments due to performance variability in large-scale distributed systems with limited observability.Objective. This thesis aims to enable reproducible performance evaluation of serverless applications and their underlying cloud infrastructure.Method. A combination of literature review and empirical research established a consolidated view on serverless applications and their performance. New solutions were developed through engineering research and used to conduct performance benchmarking field experiments in cloud environments.Findings. The review of 112 FaaS performance studies from academic and industrial sources found a strong focus on a single cloud platform using artificial micro-benchmarks and discovered that most studies do not follow reproducibility principles on cloud experimentation. Characterizing 89 serverless applications revealed that they are most commonly used for short-running tasks with low data volume and bursty workloads. A novel trace-based serverless application benchmark shows that external service calls often dominate the median end-to-end latency and cause long tail latency. The latency breakdown analysis further identifies performance challenges of serverless applications, such as long delays through asynchronous function triggers, substantial runtime initialization for coldstarts, increased performance variability under bursty workloads, and heavily provider-dependent performance characteristics. The evaluation of different cloud benchmarking methodologies has shown that only selected micro-benchmarks are suitable for estimating application performance, performance variability depends on the resource type, and batch testing on the same instance with repetitions should be used for reliable performance testing.Conclusions. The insights of this thesis can guide practitioners in building performance-optimized serverless applications and researchers in reproducibly evaluating cloud performance using suitable execution methodologies and different benchmark types

Cloud WorkBench - Infrastructure-as-Code Based Cloud Benchmarking

To optimally deploy their applications, users of Infrastructure-as-a-Service clouds are required to evaluate the costs and performance of different combinations of cloud configurations to find out which combination provides the best service level for their specific application. Unfortunately, benchmarking cloud services is cumbersome and error-prone. In this paper, we propose an architecture and concrete implementation of a cloud benchmarking Web service, which fosters the definition of reusable and representative benchmarks. In distinction to existing work, our system is based on the notion of Infrastructure-as-Code, which is a state of the art concept to define IT infrastructure in a reproducible, well-defined, and testable way. We demonstrate our system based on an illustrative case study, in which we measure and compare the disk IO speeds of different instance and storage types in Amazon EC2

Performance Benchmarking of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) Clouds with Cloud WorkBench (Tutorial)

The continuing growth of the cloud computing market has led to an unprecedented diversity of cloud services with different performance characteristics. To support service selection, researchers and practitioners conduct cloud performance benchmarking by measuring and objectively comparing the performance of different providers and configurations (e.g., instance types in different data center regions). In this tutorial, we demonstrate how to write performance tests for IaaS clouds using the Web-based benchmarking tool Cloud WorkBench (CWB). We will motivate and introduce benchmarking of IaaS cloud in general, demonstrate the execution of a simple benchmark in a public cloud environment, summarize the CWB tool architecture, and interactively develop and deploy a more advanced benchmark together with the participants

Function-as-a-Service Performance Evaluation: A Multivocal Literature Review

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is one form of the serverless cloud computing paradigm and is defined through FaaS platforms (e.g., AWS Lambda) executing event-triggered code snippets (i.e., functions). Many studies that empirically evaluate the performance of such FaaS platforms have started to appear but we are currently lacking a comprehensive understanding of the overall domain. To address this gap, we conducted a multivocal literature review (MLR) covering 112 studies from academic (51) and grey (61) literature. We find that existing work mainly studies the AWS Lambda platform and focuses on micro-benchmarks using simple functions to measure CPU speed and FaaS platform overhead (i.e., container cold starts). Further, we discover a mismatch between academic and industrial sources on tested platform configurations, find that function triggers remain insufficiently studied, and identify HTTP API gateways and cloud storages as the most used external service integrations. Following existing guidelines on experimentation in cloud systems, we discover many flaws threatening the reproducibility of experiments presented in the surveyed studies. We conclude with a discussion of gaps in literature and highlight methodological suggestions that may serve to improve future FaaS performance evaluation studies.Comment: improvements including postprint update

Software Microbenchmarking in the Cloud. How Bad is it Really?

Rigorous performance engineering traditionally assumes measuring on bare-metal environments to control for as many confounding factors as possible. Unfortunately, some researchers and practitioners might not have access, knowledge, or funds to operate dedicated performance-testing hardware, making public clouds an attractive alternative. However, shared public cloud environments are inherently unpredictable in terms of the system performance they provide. In this study, we explore the effects of cloud environments on the variability of performance test results and to what extent slowdowns can still be reliably detected even in a public cloud. We focus on software microbenchmarks as an example of performance tests and execute extensive experiments on three different well-known public cloud services (AWS, GCE, and Azure) using three different cloud instance types per service. We also compare the results to a hosted bare-metal offering from IBM Bluemix. In total, we gathered more than 4.5 million unique microbenchmarking data points from benchmarks written in Java and Go. We find that the variability of results differs substantially between benchmarks and instance types (by a coefficient of variation from 0.03% to > 100%). However, executing test and control experiments on the same instances (in randomized order) allows us to detect slowdowns of 10% or less with high confidence, using state-of-the-art statistical tests (i.e., Wilcoxon rank-sum and overlapping bootstrapped confidence intervals). Finally, our results indicate that Wilcoxon rank-sum manages to detect smaller slowdowns in cloud environments

Transpiling Applications into Optimized Serverless Orchestrations

The serverless computing paradigm promises increased development productivity by abstracting the underlying hardware infrastructure and software runtime when building distributed cloud applications. However, composing a serverless application consisting of many tiny functions is still a cumbersome and inflexible process due to the lack of a unified source code view and strong coupling to non-standardized function-level interfaces for code and configuration. In our vision, developers can focus on writing readable source code in a logical structure, which then gets transformed into an optimized multi-function serverless orchestration. Our idea involves transpilation (i.e., source-to-source transformation) based on an optimization model (e.g., cost optimization) by dynamically deciding which set of methods will be grouped into individual deployment units. A successful implementation of our vision would enable a broader range of serverless applications and allow for dynamic deployment optimization based on monitoring runtime metrics. Further, we would expect increased developer productivity by using more familiar abstractions and facilitating clean coding practices and code reuse

A Cloud Benchmark Suite Combining Micro and Applications Benchmarks

Micro and application performance benchmarks are commonly used to guide cloud service selection. However, they are often considered in isolation in a hardly reproducible setup with a flawed execution strategy. This paper presents a new execution methodology that combines micro and application benchmarks into a benchmark suite called RMIT Combined, integrates this suite into an automated cloud benchmarking environment, and implements a repeatable execution strategy. Additionally, a newly crafted Web serving benchmark called WPBench with three different load scenarios is contributed. A case study in the Amazon EC2 cloud demonstrates that choosing a cost-efficient instance type can deliver up to 40% better performance with 40% lower costs at the same time for the Web serving benchmark WPBench. Contrary to prior research, our findings reveal that network performance does not vary relevantly anymore. Our results also show that choosing a modern type of virtualization can improve disk utilization up to 10% for I/O-heavy workloads

Estimating Cloud Application Performance Based on Micro-Benchmark Profiling

The continuing growth of the cloud computing market has led to an unprecedented diversity of cloud services. To support service selection, micro-benchmarks are commonly used to identify the best performing cloud service. However, it remains unclear how relevant these synthetic micro-benchmarks are for gaining insights into the performance of real-world applications.Therefore, this paper develops a cloud benchmarking methodology that uses micro-benchmarks to profile applications and subsequently predicts how an application performs on a wide range of cloud services. A study with a real cloud provider (Amazon EC2) has been conducted to quantitatively evaluate the estimation model with 38 metrics from 23 micro-benchmarks and 2 applications from different domains. The results reveal remarkably low variability in cloud service performance and show that selected micro-benchmarks can estimate the duration of a scientific computing application with a relative error of less than 10% and the response time of a Web serving application with a relative error between 10% and 20%. In conclusion, this paper emphasizes the importance of cloud benchmarking by substantiating the suitability of micro-benchmarks for estimating application performance in comparison to common baselines but also highlights that only selected micro-benchmarks are relevant to estimate the performance of a particular application

Beyond Microbenchmarks: The SPEC-RG Vision for a Comprehensive Serverless Benchmark

Serverless computing services, such as Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), hold the attractive promise of a high level of abstraction and high performance, combined with the minimization of operational logic. Several large ecosystems of serverless platforms, both open- and closed-source, aim to realize this promise. Consequently, a lucrative market has emerged. However, the performance trade-offs of these systems are not well-understood. Moreover, it is exactly the high level of abstraction and the opaqueness of the operational-side that make performance evaluation studies of serverless platforms challenging. Learning from the history of IT platforms, we argue that a benchmark for serverless platforms could help address this challenge. We envision a comprehensive serverless benchmark, which we contrast to the narrow focus of prior work in this area. We argue that a comprehensive benchmark will need to take into account more than just runtime overhead, and include notions of cost, realistic workloads, more (open-source) platforms, and cloud integrations. Finally, we show through preliminary real-world experiments how such a benchmark can help compare the performance overhead when running a serverless workload on state-of-the-art platforms